Old PC Deals

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 10 June 2011

RTC USA & J... Ah, What's The Program Doc?

Posted on 01:11 by Unknown
The following (quoted text) is an excerpt from one of the upcoming RTC USA classes I am presenting... More to follow... Follow the RTC, that is!!!

These images illustrate but 2 of the many kinds of Planning & Programmatic projects possible. Using Revit as the main production tool; we created a scenario where immediate program validation & design verification was possible and sometimes actually FUN!!!







 "...Before anything we must formulate a road-map to ensure predictable results, inclusive of most of our needs.



The common road-map for any project is: Assess / Devise / Generate / Validate.

Assess The type of project will dictate what approach is used and there are many possible approaches. Herein we will look at several project types: TI and Office, Urban Planning and Client specific projects; in your approach define the scope of the project, based on client program, practice needs, etc. Generate a topology to capture thoughts and ideas, as these will most likely fluctuate so having good process documentation is paramount to train & communicate to colleagues and others.

Devise (Plan) your needs, keeping the end result in mind; “Will this become an office standard, will it need 3D review or simply 2D and Informational” and on and on. Sketch out what the components and results want to look like –a sort of cartoon set of components and sheet design, etc. At the end of this document is included a simple but useful 2 page “Family Planning” document that I use to sketch out & help formulate and plan families, designs and so forth; this way when I get to the actual creation phase I have a good understanding of the items necessary and have a kind of blueprint for blueprints, as it were.

Generate or Create: Need I say more? Well, I will… This is the time to begin to create the families, key schedules, schedules, parameters (shared & or project), design options and any other components that were deemed necessary in the assessment and planning phases. The suggested workflow is to create prototypes for each individual object, outside of any ‘official’ template first, so validation can be accomplished without creating havoc in final template files.

Best Practice: PROTOTYPE FIRST; whenever creating any family, etc.

Validate. The QA & QC phase. Flex all families in both the family editor as well as in a proxy project, again before bringing them into any prospective project or template. Test all other components & schedules, etc. we only want completely functional and tested objects into Revit®..."

Hope to see you (t)here!!!

Images courtesy: Gensler
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • 1 Sure Way To Get What You Want ;-)
    Last 2 days 2 Vote @ JayZallan to the #AUGI Board bit.ly/rFoQu2 else @ davewlight will send around the boys to get U #SavagedByKittens —...
  • CAD FILES IN REVIT: ON OR OFF THIS VIEW OR THAT
    Well I must set my views on BAD CAD data aside because sometimes we need to use CAD files in our Revit projects Especially for Site Plans. H...
  • Make Them Detail Components: A How-To
    Recently I got a complement/comment posted to an older blog entry “ Converting CAD Details To Revit Details: Just Do It...One way or another...
  • More Fun With Views: Stacked Isometrics and More
    A friend asked me how I made stacked 3D Plan Views in a project I was showing him; so I offer this up for everyone (who sees it) to use and...
  • RTC USA Me Part 2: A+Revit Families
    This time the presentation is first & the handout after... Only one may be needed, as they are mainly the same... you decide though... C...
  • ____(1)fest 2009
    ____ing (2) in a ____ (3)can? Better than that!!! First off to Virginia Gardiner, the Designer of the Loowatt, I apologize for the low-brow ...
  • Do You Want To Be An Architect?
    Sage advice that is spot on. Too bad the damned video isn't shown in Architecture Schools (or earlier)!!!
  • Time for a change of direction: The Z Direction!!!
    Holograms... "to all my friends" OK, I recently met with some dynamic BIM folks at Suffolk Construction and we discussed all thi...
  • Central File Transfer Processes
    Whether transferring to others or even working from home (see the BONUS!!! section) Central files need extra attention paid when dealing wit...
  • 3D Grids In Revit | An Oldie But Goodie Done Again
    So I need (or want :-) to use a Grid represented in 3D in Revit and while Navisworks can now visualize the levels and grids in 3D, alas Revi...

Categories

  • Addons
  • AEC
  • angled
  • Architecture
  • Arrays
  • AU
  • AUGI
  • Autodesk
  • Autodesk University
  • BIM
  • calculated values
  • Content
  • dirty
  • DWF
  • Elevations
  • Engineering
  • Error Reporting
  • Errors
  • Extensions
  • family
  • Family Types
  • File Locations
  • Filters
  • fire rated
  • fire rating filters revit
  • Fire Ratings
  • formula
  • formulas
  • Future
  • Graphic Overrides
  • graphics
  • Happy New Year
  • Helix
  • Hide at Scales Coarser Than
  • inconsistent units
  • Las Vegas
  • marketing
  • MEP
  • model
  • Multiple Page PDF from Revit
  • New Features Workshop
  • no one said to model a cow
  • object overrides
  • Overrides
  • Parameters
  • PDF
  • Ramp
  • Revit
  • Revit 2009 New Features Workshop
  • Revit 2010
  • Revit Architecture 2009 New Features Workshop
  • Revit Crash
  • Revit Families
  • Revit filters
  • revit formulas
  • Revit Web Update
  • Revitisms
  • scale
  • section
  • Shared Parameters
  • slanted
  • sloped
  • solids
  • Spiral
  • Spiral Ramp
  • Spiral Stairs
  • Structure
  • Think Twice and Place Once
  • Tools
  • Use Revit Like Revit
  • view
  • Views
  • volumes

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (17)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (24)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ▼  2011 (55)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ▼  June (3)
      • RTC USA Me Part 2: A+Revit Families
      • RTC USA Me Part 1: Ah, Whats The Program Doc? Revi...
      • RTC USA & J... Ah, What's The Program Doc?
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2010 (55)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2009 (68)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (13)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2008 (27)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2007 (39)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2006 (14)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile