Old PC Deals

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 23 June 2008

DIMENSION OVERRIDES IN THE STORM

Posted on 01:03 by Unknown
Do you want to use a Text Override in Revit? Great just don't be too clever because you can really fuck your world up.

Below is the dialog that pops up when you click the Numerical Value of a dimension in Revit, since the release of 2009. Good so far... I like the new additions to just Prefix & Suffix... The whole Above & Below fields are quite useful.


What isn't altogether wonderful is the "Replace with Text" value. I say altogether because we can get this to be horribly incorrect, even though it's a good tool when used correctly. If objects report an odd dimension then just move the objects; please don't use fake dimensions and really only use the Text Override for text ONLY.

I know that you may be thinking I am off base here but remember the fact that we weren't able to fake a dimension meant we had to actually do our job correctly(er)... what was so wrong with showing the supposed number with V.I.F. after it, etc.... I know there are uses for replacing the actual # with text only but we can always find a way to subvert that system and get our documentation to be, well, just plain wrong; And don't our contracts say that the printed documents take precedence?!!! If so this new functionality is one to steer clear of, lest we add a new item to the list of possible litigation we are exposed to.

If they would have asked me I would just have had this value be visually toggled or it would simply not allow any numbers in it... Why? Look at the 2 dimensions in the next image and tell me what the top dimension says... (Note: The bottom dimension is the true dimensional value)

Yeah, by using that accent grave ( ` ) symbol I made Revit's previous incomparable correctness fall apart. All would be good if Revit would have actually not allowed the number to be fucked with, like the following dialog states...


The fact that while one can't use the "foot" and "inch" symbols ( ' and ") together; one could use the accent grave ( ` ) symbol, etc; then Revit sees the whole string as text and bottom line DOES for all intents and purposes allow the reverse of what the previous image says.

Remember, If you want to keep your job then just move the objects if a dimension is reporting an odd value; please don't use fake dimensions and only use the Text Override for "Text".

The following is another good issue to think about if you use "broken" or "split" views: CLICK ME; I'M FROM AUGI.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Do You Want To Be An Architect?
    Sage advice that is spot on. Too bad the damned video isn't shown in Architecture Schools (or earlier)!!!
  • ____(1)fest 2009
    ____ing (2) in a ____ (3)can? Better than that!!! First off to Virginia Gardiner, the Designer of the Loowatt, I apologize for the low-brow ...
  • Central File Transfer Processes
    Whether transferring to others or even working from home (see the BONUS!!! section) Central files need extra attention paid when dealing wit...
  • RTC USA Me Part 2: A+Revit Families
    This time the presentation is first & the handout after... Only one may be needed, as they are mainly the same... you decide though... C...
  • Fun With Revit & Cows
    Here's a bit of fun with Marcello's Cow for LARUG (Hey, check out LARUG's Group Site and sign up/join if you want to come to ...
  • MythBusted? BIM/CAD is no panacea for lacking experience
    Images from the Gommateshvara Statue I visited yesterday... and some of those 650 steps that I am about to mention (yikes on the calf muscl...
  • Namaste From India (not na)
    5:00 am, India time... do you know where your J is? So after the 20 some odd hours of flying time, I am finally here in Bangalore; the Silic...
  • Slanted Volumes...I guess the Ramp tool isn't enough?
    I've been asked several times in the past few months to create (or show others how to create) Parametric Slanted Volumes. It seems that...
  • Scope Boxes Redux
    Looking for some guidance on how to use scope boxes? Wondering just what you can use them for? Thought so...Here is one way to use them to g...
  • Revit Users and You (Sirs?)
    An excerpt from an Evite for the Los Angeles Revit Users Group meeting for July : (yes, click the link if you'd like to be invited...ju...

Categories

  • Addons
  • AEC
  • angled
  • Architecture
  • Arrays
  • AU
  • AUGI
  • Autodesk
  • Autodesk University
  • BIM
  • calculated values
  • Content
  • dirty
  • DWF
  • Elevations
  • Engineering
  • Error Reporting
  • Errors
  • Extensions
  • family
  • Family Types
  • File Locations
  • Filters
  • fire rated
  • fire rating filters revit
  • Fire Ratings
  • formula
  • formulas
  • Future
  • Graphic Overrides
  • graphics
  • Happy New Year
  • Helix
  • Hide at Scales Coarser Than
  • inconsistent units
  • Las Vegas
  • marketing
  • MEP
  • model
  • Multiple Page PDF from Revit
  • New Features Workshop
  • no one said to model a cow
  • object overrides
  • Overrides
  • Parameters
  • PDF
  • Ramp
  • Revit
  • Revit 2009 New Features Workshop
  • Revit 2010
  • Revit Architecture 2009 New Features Workshop
  • Revit Crash
  • Revit Families
  • Revit filters
  • revit formulas
  • Revit Web Update
  • Revitisms
  • scale
  • section
  • Shared Parameters
  • slanted
  • sloped
  • solids
  • Spiral
  • Spiral Ramp
  • Spiral Stairs
  • Structure
  • Think Twice and Place Once
  • Tools
  • Use Revit Like Revit
  • view
  • Views
  • volumes

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (17)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (24)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2011 (55)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2010 (55)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2009 (68)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (13)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ▼  2008 (27)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ▼  June (2)
      • DIMENSION OVERRIDES IN THE STORM
      • Scope Boxes Redux
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2007 (39)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2006 (14)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile