Old PC Deals

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 2 July 2007

Converting CAD Details To Revit Details: Just Do It...One way or another.

Posted on 17:19 by Unknown
Before you read on note that there is a companion to this (or as you may find a replacement)... RIGHT HERE... added 07-09-2010...

First off thanks to Nike for unknowingly letting me use their old slogan.

Secondly:
Yes, the following are all 2D detailing methods for Revit!!! We can talk about leveraging our model for project specific details based off the 3D geometry later: that's a different diatribe... Also please note: All times are empirical estimates and are placed as general guides, to be used solely as approximations, as I have no way to know how your teams can or will perform, how detailed your details are, etc., etc... Now on with the show.

There is a question that seems to always come up about what to do with existing and/or typical CAD details in Revit. And that question is...
What to do with existing and/or typical CAD details in Revit?

Do we redraw them (Can you say Intern?), do we Revitize them or maybe just Link the CAD files in and continue to edit them outside of Revit? Let's take a look at these options, shall we?
  • Plan A: The "In a perfect world" approach. -Draw (and/or redraw) all details entirely in Revit.
      • Ensures the cleanest Revit geometry (hopefully). (This approach can be expected to yield the antithesis of what can happen in plan B when the CAD data is bad. For the results of some 'Bad CAD' data see Image 1).
      • Details will be formatted and can be saved into project templates, pre placed on sheets and just waiting to be printed!!! Or we can use FILE / INSERT FROM FILE / VIEWS... for another method of propagating these, now existing views, into other current and future Revit projects.
      • Devise a projected time line within which to accomplish this by. Remember; eat the elephant one bite at a time, it's the only way to manage this and not freak the whole office (or boss) out! An example is: If The office has 1,000 details (traveling West at 65 MPH) and Johnny manages a team of 5 users (and 3 of them play hockey) and each user draws 1 detail a day: When will they be in Chicago?...Uuummm I mean, when will they be finished? They will be complete before 1 year comes to pass [200 work days to be in Chicago...not bad]...Hey here's a good idea for a team vacation incentive: Complete the detail work in half the time agreed upon, while still getting 'the work' out. Details done, morale high.
      • If you are on a 1-2 year plan to fully implement Revit then this method will help you enormously!!! Each detail should only take 1-4 hours once a good work flow is obtained. -Since these are quite often details that we already have elsewhere and we can print them...
  • Plan B: The "In a nearly perfect world" approach. -Revitize CAD details that you already have. (See Images 2 through 10 below!!!).
      • This consists of turning the CAD data into Revit data.
      • If your CAD teams draw (in CAD) with 8 decimal place precision, and they are always drafting perfectly, mindful of their snaps, etc., etc., etc., then what's shown in Image 1 will never happen, making this Plan = or > Plan A.
      • BUT!!! If your CAD teams draw with 1, 2, even 4 decimal place precision then all bets are off and I can almost guarantee that you will see errors! In the cases where Plan B yields less than perfect results you need to Review Warnings!!! very carefully and often to ensure that no errors show up in your actual projects...PLEASE don't let that happen!!! (Remember this later when I talk about my "Paranoia Abatement Protocol" AKA: The Old Test Project...Don't Revitize a CAD detail without it!!!).
      • Once a good work flow is obtained this could take 1/2 to 2 hours per detail.
      • Details are now Revit formatted just as in Plan A.
      • Devise a projected time line within which to accomplish Revitizing all CAD details by. My 'Chicago algorithm', the elephant and the 1-2 year plan benefits are all still applicable to this approach as well as for Plan A (Yaay)...Though the math for this option may be as little as half or better. Again, depending on the users, the CAD data, etc.
      • Sounds enticing and maybe exciting...and perhaps it is. I suggest at least a test by the same Revit user, where they take 2 sets of similar details; maybe 3 details for each option. See which works best for you, your standards and your office...
The now famous 'Image 1'
  • Plan C: The short-term, temporary or "Oh Shit, just get them out the door" approach. AKA: The "We'll get to it later" method.
      • Link (not import) the actual CAD files into separate drafting views. Fast to link but could (will) pose more work when wanting lines to import 'correctly' etc...not the end of the world but if it's not already set up and you have to print NOW you're F#@*ed.
      • Possible issues with text, leaders...But if it's "Oh Shit, just get them out the door" then we gotta do what we gotta do...
    • When (or if) you use this method, remember that when you use the Detail Callout tool you will need to choose the "Reference other view" from the Options Bar & then pick the correct drafting view from the drop down list.
      • Keep putting Plan A and/or Plan B on hold and you may find your teams are wasting so much time opening, panning, waiting that you schedule that in-house meeting where you, or others roll out the "Today we begin Revitizing all of our details" project..."Who would like to volunteer?...Yes Johnny, later is today"
      • Obvious method for when the clients or planning commissions, etc. need info before it was planned and/or scheduled for.
The detail I used herein is very simplistic with few lines when compared to most construction details I have come across and still it generated 30 errors!!! (As seen in image 1) Yes, the 30 errors "(may be ignored)" but being that the lines are all "slightly off axis and may cause inaccuracies" that is just too much risk for my liking or for me to take into the future of my projects, if I can at all help it.

REVITIZING DETAILS EXPLAINED
  • Begin a new, blank 'detail creation' project. (Not a real Project!!!)
  • Create a new Drafting View.
  • Name it now (it's best at this point, especially if you get into a "production line" mode. It can help make this Revitizing, transitioning faster.) we can always change the scale later.
  • Open that view and Import the CAD file there. Image 2.
    • Remember, Linking is Plan C, so make sure to Import.
  • I inverted the colors and let all else be default.
    • Leaving the CAD in color makes it easier for me to see what I have already changed and what I have yet to change...
Image 2
  • Explode (full) See Revit Help and search for 'explode' to find all you...maybe...need to know.
    • Note that by using partial explodes you may be able to shave a little more time off of this process, depending on the consistency of the CAD files, etc...
  • Select all the linework and change it from the CAD's styles to one of Revit's own. Image 3.
    • Usually I adjust the lineweights later in the final, clean, project version of the detail but that's your call.
  • Convert in this same manner any CAD hatch patterns.
Image 3
  • Convert in this same manner any CAD Text styles and recreate all leaders. Images 4 & 5.
Image 4

Image 5
Hide all (now Revit) text and leaders. Image 6.
Image 6

Delete all exploded CAD leaders and arrow head remnants. Image 7
Image 7
Unhide all hidden objects. Image 8.
Image 8
  • Verify by selecting everything and hitting the 'filter' button. Image 9.
    • If you only see Revit items listed then...
  • Hit CTRL/C (Copy to clipboard).
    • Now it's the time for the Paranoia Test.
  • If you see legacy CAD names, etc. go back to the cleaning & converting until it's all clean, Revit geometry.
Image 9
THE PARANOIA TEST:
  • Open another new, blank project.
  • Create a new drafting view & open it.
    • Its name doesn't matter here, since this is just for testing purposes.
  • CTRL/V (Paste from clipboard).
    • Here comes the test:
  • Select everything and hit the filter...what do you see?
  • If it's all Revit geometry, etc. then this detail is now safe for project use, if not then something slipped by, but don't worry: this extra little step disallowed your project from becoming muddied by CAD data.
  • Image 10: the final detail with lineweights adjusted...
Image 10
Oh Shit, I nearly forgot: do you really want to F#@* up a Revit Project? Explode a lot or just one large CAD file directly into your project...Don't do it!!! It CAN be tracked!!!

-J
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Slanted Volumes...I guess the Ramp tool isn't enough?
    I've been asked several times in the past few months to create (or show others how to create) Parametric Slanted Volumes. It seems that...
  • Have You Been Overridden...Again?
    Yes I wish there was a Clear Overrides button that would give a list of all objects in a view that have been overridden, along with the obl...
  • (no title)
    This is mainly to help me remember the way to negate the "Inconsistent Units" error but I am sure there are more people who will f...
  • Nice comment, Thanks Tim
    A wholly unrelated image from Bangalore. Oh and... Tim said... (In regards to the post: Does being Green have a very un-Green cost to it? ...
  • OMFGLOL-VL: A Discourse on Emerging Tectonic Visualization and the Effects of Materiality on Praxis. Or an essay on the ridiculous way architects talk
    I was bumping about last night and while reading Doctor, Lawyer, Architect, Fail on the Architects 2Zebras site I hit the link for Witold ...
  • In Place Revit Family: The Floor
    Well, I have been asked to show a colleague how to create a metal deck floor. YAAY!!! First I asked the user (as you should ask yourself) if...
  • AU 2010 Results Now & Later
    Well, I am still shooting for 10 status but am glad to be a 9 :-) Great session and a great AU!!! Thanks to all who came by and participated...
  • Save to New File...
    I got this question from a colleague and thought it appropriate to post my reply herein... Q Does anyone know why the "Save to New File...
  • Spiral Ramps: a Helix of a Solution
    Before I begin to begin (added 06-11-2008), I seem to have found that Internet Explorer still sucks and will not show some of the graphics f...
  • Short Post, Huge Point!!! See the Comments too
    CAD-vs-BIM is all wrong!!! (but i'll keep the name for now). CAD is BIM and vice versa. More to follow... OK I'm back... Rise up. C...

Categories

  • Addons
  • AEC
  • angled
  • Architecture
  • Arrays
  • AU
  • AUGI
  • Autodesk
  • Autodesk University
  • BIM
  • calculated values
  • Content
  • dirty
  • DWF
  • Elevations
  • Engineering
  • Error Reporting
  • Errors
  • Extensions
  • family
  • Family Types
  • File Locations
  • Filters
  • fire rated
  • fire rating filters revit
  • Fire Ratings
  • formula
  • formulas
  • Future
  • Graphic Overrides
  • graphics
  • Happy New Year
  • Helix
  • Hide at Scales Coarser Than
  • inconsistent units
  • Las Vegas
  • marketing
  • MEP
  • model
  • Multiple Page PDF from Revit
  • New Features Workshop
  • no one said to model a cow
  • object overrides
  • Overrides
  • Parameters
  • PDF
  • Ramp
  • Revit
  • Revit 2009 New Features Workshop
  • Revit 2010
  • Revit Architecture 2009 New Features Workshop
  • Revit Crash
  • Revit Families
  • Revit filters
  • revit formulas
  • Revit Web Update
  • Revitisms
  • scale
  • section
  • Shared Parameters
  • slanted
  • sloped
  • solids
  • Spiral
  • Spiral Ramp
  • Spiral Stairs
  • Structure
  • Think Twice and Place Once
  • Tools
  • Use Revit Like Revit
  • view
  • Views
  • volumes

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (17)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (24)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2011 (55)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (8)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2010 (55)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2009 (68)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (8)
    • ►  July (13)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2008 (27)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (5)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (5)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ▼  2007 (39)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ▼  July (6)
      • Name, Rename & More from a Revit Schedule
      • In Place Revit Family: The Floor
      • Revit Error Reporting: Again, Just Do It!!!
      • The Greening of Architectural Production: Using Re...
      • Sloping Floor & Roof Slabs in Revit
      • Converting CAD Details To Revit Details: Just Do I...
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (5)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (1)
  • ►  2006 (14)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (4)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile